Wow, I didn't know that was the end to that story. But at least Tamron USA was
able to fix it, albeit at significant cost. Thanks for the heads up to the
rest of us.
Skip
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Please reply to [skipwilliams at pobox.com]
Direct responses to the email address on the header may get lost
----------------------------------------------------------------->
>Subject: Re: [OM] Tamron 180/2.5 2.5/180
> From: GPaul64@xxxxxxx
> Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 10:46:49 -0400
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>In a message dated 8/12/2003 8:27:19 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes:
>
>> I've talked to three persons who have had their focus points go off,
>> preventing them from focusing at infinity. Greg Logidice was the last
>> person who had this problem, he's still on the list. Admittedly, this is a
>> very small sample and has NO basis for representing the larger
>> population....but it is
>> strange.
>>
>> skip
>
>Hi folks,
>
>The problem with my Tamron was that it could not focus to infinity. Tamron
>USA said the internal focus helicoid had been damaged by impact and they
>replaced it for about $300 (ouch). The lens is otherwise in excellent
>condition otherwise, so I figured it was worth it.
>
>Regarding the impact damage, the only evidence of such damage was an
>indentation on the underside of the metal barrel that could likely have been
>the result of a sharp blow. I saw the indentation when I purchased the lens,
>(used) but seeing nothing else obviously wrong with the lens, thought nothing
>more of it. I never noticed the infinity focus problem myself because I
>usually used it as a long macro lens. Skip actually noticed it while he had
>the lens on loan from me.
>
>It could be that the lens is somewhat fragile. But then again, it is all
>metal - heavy and robust - and seems to be built along the same lines as the
>larger 300/2.8, of which I haven't heard of any such problems. I'm not sure
>if a lot of other lenses could withstand the blow my lens evidently took
>without some internal damage.
>
>Nonetheless, it's fixed now and in top condition. It does focus much, much
>smoother now, and is a joy to use. Here's an example of a recent shot
>(although clearly not at infinity)
>
>http://www.gplphotography.com/Up%20Close%20Sub%20Pages/Desert%20Bloom.htm
>
>It is curious that we have seen several of these lenses now that may have had
>problems. That said, I wouldn't let that fact dissuade me from purchasing it.
> Rather the opposite - having been warned, I would know exactly what to check
>for. As long as the lens passes this inspection, be assured that it is a
>keeper - very sharp, bright, and contrasty. Probably the best 180 this side
>of the Zuiko 180/2.0.
>
>Hope this helps,
>
>Greg Logiodice
>
>
>
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|