Yeah. But the 200/4 (to pick a cruel example) is too light for its own good.
Without a tripod collar, my results from that lens were more "beastly" than
jewel-like. (I said *MY* results!)
But you're right. The Series1 90 2.5 macro is a handful compared to the Zuiko
100/2.8 . I gotta tell ya- all of the recent post about the 85/2 sound nice.
<shrug>
I'm gonna be shooting a LOT next week and I can't wait!
Lama
Lama said,
> > ....One by one I've sold all of my Zuikos (except for the 50mm f/1.8 MiJ
> > !!) for less
> >expensive, faster, or sometimes sharper lenses.....
> From: Mike <watershed@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx said
> And a substantially heavier kit.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|