ML Archiv: Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105

Subject:	Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105
From:	"John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Sun, 20 Jul 2003 00:48:16 -0500

At 06:20 PM 7/19/03, /S wrote:

35-70 altho the 105 has its share of proponents; i'll sure you'll hearfrom John Lind shortly.


35-105/3.5~4.5 Zuiko (has "close-up" helical; about 1:5 mag. @ 35mm)
or
35-105/2.8 Tamron Adaptall 2

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] [OT] Olympus Stylus Question, (continued) Re: [OM] [OT] Olympus Stylus Question, John Hermanson [OM] another OM part, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] another OM part, clintonr Re: [OM] another OM part, Fernando Gonzalez Gentile Re: [OM] another OM part, John Hermanson Re: [OM] another OM part, John Hermanson Re: [OM] [OT] Olympus Stylus Question, clintonr Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, John Duggan Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, Moose Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, Siddiq Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, John A. Lind <=

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Plastic Lens question, Jeff Keller
Next by Date:	[OM] RE: 2SP Illuminator (was Plastic Lens question), Piers Hemy
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105, Siddiq
Next by Thread:	[OM] Pictures from England - Flying Legends, Gary L. Edwards
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]