Moose, and everyone else who replied, thanks for the ideas. After much
thought, and changing ideas more than once, the 35/70 gets the vote..I
think! I'm more of a wide angle guy and the fact that it zooms the same as
my 28/48 tips the balance. For longer range I have my Tamron 90mm and an
Olympus 2x converter. See you all in a few weeks...Don't sell all the
bargains while i'm gone! regards, John Duggan, Wales, UK.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Moose" <olymoose@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, July 19, 2003 9:59 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] OM 35/70 vs 35 105
Major snip..........
1 or 2 touch doesn't make much difference to me,
> especially if I'm using only one zoom for some time, I just seem to get
> used to it quickly. I guess I sorta prefer 1-touch, but it's not much of
> a factor.
> Overall, for me, the extra reach of the '105' wins out.
> How's that for way too much esoterica about a simple lens choice?
> Moose
>
> John Duggan wrote:
>
> >The 35/105 is 1 touch and slower..
> >
>
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|