Subject: | RE: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, Marv, and Alfred ! |
---|---|
From: | "Timpe, Jim" <Jim.Timpe@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:36:06 -0700 |
>-----Original Message----- >From: Thomas Heide Clausen >Subject: Re: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, >Marv, and Alfred! > >For all I know, there was never made a Zuiko lens that took >52mm filters. Hence, among Zuikoholics, 52mm is indeed an odd >filter size Basically, true on the face of it. The two exceptions are the two 'floaters', the 35-70/3.5~4.8 and 70-210/4.5~5.6 (the Cossina lenses) are both 52mm. Another reason to disown them.... < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, Marv, and Alfred!, Tom Scales |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, Marv, and Alfred !, Bill Stanke |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, Marv, and Alfred!, RickM |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Gee, we should be buying from Patricia, Marv, and Alfred !, Bill Stanke |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |