Works OK if you're doing one-of-a-kind things: commercial, industrial,
advertising, etc., it's relatively trivial working with a few photographs
that make the final cut.
I'll take you up on your offer about some pros thinking differently or
perhaps thinking differently about other types of professional work. For
stuff that demands hundreds of photographs at a whack, it's no longer
trivial. It has to fit standard album print sizes. Also not trivial for
larger prints being delivered to the average consumer . . . the
overwhelming majority want to buy the cheapest 8x10, 11x14 or 16x20
standard size frame at ???-Mart, stuff the portrait into it, and nail it to
the wall or put it on the mantle over the fireplace. Mounting???
Matting??? Who said anything about proper mounting and matting to protect
the print? That costs more $$.
Negativity emerging again. Wife reminded me last night that at least half
the weddings I'm doing will result in their precious photographs being
burned five years or less after they're delivered. Divorce rate around
here is pretty high. Makes her wonder why people bother to spend BIG $$$
on weddings. Doesn't change how they feel about anything amiss with the
pix a week after the honeymoon though.
-- John
At 12:11 PM 6/30/03, Mike wrote:
>
>
>....the same aspect ratio.....golden section....do it right and minimize
waste.....make the papers to fit.....
>
I don't know how anyone else does it but I crop the picture the way I
like it. I don't even think about the size, paper is such a minimal
cost. Of course pros and processors may think differently :>)
Mike
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|