E-10 has similar resolution as D30 indicated by some test reports, check it
out. D30 is much stronger only on noise and not resolution. Althought Provia
meausred 60lp/mm and Velvia is 80lp/mm but with a normal lens the different
could be smaller. Anyway since the result shown big different who care about
the slightly different in equipment?
BTW, I will make another shot with the 10D and compare it with the same
Velvia slide and let you know the result, the 10D is sure better than D30
right?
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Stephen Scharf" <scharfsj@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> C.H.,
>
> The Luminous Landscape article compared Provia 100 to the D30, not Velvia
to an E-10. Not sure that that your E-10 comparison to Velvia is a
comparable situation in this case. While the E-10 is 4 megapixel, the 3
megapixel CMOS sensor in a D30 is far larger, and CMOS sensors, provide,
IMHO, better image quality than CCD's. D30's were reknown for producing much
better image quality than larger megapixel (e.g. 4 or 5 megapixel 1/1/8" or
2/3") but smaller format CCD sensors.
>
> But Dan's point is still well taken....there's much more to image quality
from a digital camera than the no. of megapixels. Anyone who has seen the
image improvements that C*n*n's DIGIC brings to an S45 compared to an S40 or
a 10D has to a D60 knows this to be true.
>
> BTW, Mike Veglia says you're doing wonderful things with your 10D and
Zuiko lenses...please send me a link so I can view your images.
>
> Regards,
> Stephen.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|