I don't think the 90/2 is sharper than the 100/2, in fact I think the
opposite. That's kind of why I like it. The 100/2 is so sharp that portraits
didn't seem flattering.
Tom
> I've also got the 100/2 Zuiko. It's one of my favorites. It gets
> used a lot shooting landscapes, nearly as much as all the wide
> angles combined. I'll include it in my comparison of the two
> macros. If the 90/2 is sharper than the 100/2, then I'll have to
> try it against the 50/2 Zuiko, which I consider the best of the
> Zuikos -- at least the best of the ones I've got.
>
> Walt
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|