Whatever you say, you're the expert.
I do like Zuikos, and with 18,21,24,28,35,50,85,100,135,200 and 300mm
fixed and 35-70/3.6, 35-70/3.5-4.5 and 75-150 zooms, I don't think I can
be accused of being under Zuikoed.
If somebody wants to send me a 90/2 for tryout, maybe I can be convinced
;-) .
The 40/2 looks cute, but can't possibly be worth the price to me. If
priced like a 35mm, sure I might try one. My very nice 35/2.8 cost $50.
Moose
C.H.Ling wrote:
Moose, you can't say that, we love the OM system is not only for its camera,
the Zuikos definitely have something that the others are missing. You can
only feel it but it cannot be measured technically or at this moment there
is no equipment to do that ;-)
I'm sure you cannot replace the 90/2 with 85/2 and 100/2, it is a legendary
lens with magic glow. It improve the image quality of 35mm to medium format
level, believe me, I have all three lenses. Oh! I just acquired a 40/2, yes,
the one designed for press photographer, I will see how it improve my shoots
and I believe it will do ;-)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|