Subject: | RE: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW |
---|---|
From: | "Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Tue, 10 Jun 2003 18:53:14 +1000 |
> > It was a 10D, the reason being, that a used Hassey with a > 80mm f2.8 is > going to cost you LESS than a 10D. So they wanted to do the > comparison > at the price point also.. > Let's face it, a 10D is going to be worth almost $0 in a few years and that Hasselblad probably won't have changed. ...Wayne < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Albert |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [OM] Star Trails, Piers Hemy |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Albert |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] C*non 10D vs. Hassey 503CW, Albert |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |