Hmm, worth thinking about. I should probably rune some tests with the
C3030z of that approach and compare it with scanned slides. Thanks,
Dan.
--thomas
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 04:37:26 -0600
"Daniel Mitchell" <danmitchell@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thomas Heide Clausen wrote:
> > Well, I do have a couple of thousand slides, which a dslr is not
> > going to do anything about. Hmm....mumble mumble.....
>
> You know, it almost could, given a slide adapter for bellows or
> something;
> I don't know how much faster that would be than a slide scanner,
> but I'd guess faster on the image capture, at the least.
>
> Heck, you don't even need that -- if you shoot slides, presumably
> you have
> a projector of some sort; set the digital up so that it covers the
> projection screen, and then click, advance the slide projector,
> click, shoot the projected image, repeat. It should be possible to
> do a photo easily every few seconds that way.
>
> As for image quality, I'm not sure -- it certainly introduces a
> lot of
> extra places for it to be lost, but it might be worth trying.
>
> -- dan
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
--
------------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://byzantium.inria.fr:8080/~voop
------------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|