| Subject: | Re: [OM] 2 XA Converter and 200/4 'false recall' question |
|---|---|
| From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
| Date: | Sat, 31 May 2003 12:03:43 EDT |
In a message dated 5/31/2003 8:40:26 AM Central Standard Time, fgnzalez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx writes: > I'm now quite surprised that the resources I consulted, including the > description sheet inside the box, does include the /4. Isn't this good news? > According to the Olympus Sales Information File (a dealer reference, the publication date which is unknown) it was suitable for the 100mm f2.8, 135mm f2.8, 135mm f3.5, 200mm f4 and the 100-200mm zoom. Bill Barber |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] 2 XA Converter and 200/4, Mike |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Body Cap with a hole, is pinhole "lens"?, Joshua Putnam |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Final report on *Bay screw-up, Walt Wayman |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 2 XA Converter and 200/4 'false recall' question, Moose |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |