Thanks, Matt. I sure will if I need to. But I hope the Polaroid will see
me through to the point at which I turn 100% to a digital source. I don't
mind the time I spend "spotting" my scans. I learn a lot about my
equipment and my photos looking at every part of them in actual pixels.
Cheers,
Joel W.
At 08:15 AM 4/27/2003 -0700, you wrote:
I've tried several scanners, and the units with ICE(Nikon 4000 ED I'm
most familiar with) are incredible. Indispensable? Well, you have to try
it to see what you've been living without. It saves a LOT of time over
editing out defects manually.
My best advice: there are several online resources that review
photographic equipment, i.e. scanners, etc.. Do the research, If you
have the resources or acquaintances, try some out!
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Tom Scales
Sent: Sunday, April 27, 2003 3:50 AM
To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [OM] Which slide scanner
Joel,
Perhaps you would never use it, but I do. I've owned/used the SS4000,
SS4000+ and 4000ED. I kept the 4000ED because of the batch scan, but
SS4000+ they
are all fine scanners. ICE, though, is incredible, at least in its
latest version (that's an important point, I believe only the latest
Nikon and Minolta have the latest version).
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|