The 28/3.5 I have delivers crisp images with very good contrast. I'd assumed
it was multicoated until I looked up Paul Farrar's page to quote to you...
:-)
Here are some URLs anyway in case you don't have them:
http://www.datasync.com/~farrar/zuiko.html
http://members.aol.com/olympusom/lenstests/default.htm
http://olympus.dementia.org/eSIF/om-sif.htm
http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/olympus.faq.html
http://brashear.phys.appstate.edu/lhawkins/photo/buying-used-om.faq.html
http://www.skipwilliams.com/olympus/zuiko_ebay_analysis.htm
>From the lens tests on the 3.5:
Notes: Moderately low contrast @ f/3.5, moderately high contrast elsewise.
Regards,
Andrew
> Date: 9 Apr 2003 17:05:00 -0000
> From: md4303@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Now I want to buy a 28mm but I am uncertain about the 3.5 or 2.8.
> I need highest contast and resolution between F5.6-11.
> I know that the 28mm 3.5 is a very good performer but is single-coated lens.
> The 2.8 has less resolution(maybe) but is multi-coated.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|