Subject: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm |
---|---|
From: | "Tom Scales" <tscales@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:39:18 -0500 |
Beautiful shot! Tom > At 10:10 AM 4/1/2003, you wrote: > ><snip> > >Bob > >who still wishes he had a 38/2.8, and is missing his 16/3.5... > > I like the 16mm. you need it. check this photo: > http://www.zuik.net/om/rdp3_vg03_6_23web.jpg > > When you put the horizon in the center, who needs rectilinear? > Wayne > < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] OT - to lie or to lay, BA |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] om-1 versus om-3, Joel Wilcox |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm, W Shumaker |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm, Moose |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |