| Subject: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm |
|---|---|
| From: | W Shumaker <omlist@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:58:17 -0500 |
At 10:10 AM 4/1/2003, you wrote: ><snip> >Bob >who still wishes he had a 38/2.8, and is missing his 16/3.5... I like the 16mm. you need it. check this photo: http://www.zuik.net/om/rdp3_vg03_6_23web.jpg When you put the horizon in the center, who needs rectilinear? Wayne |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] -3Ti - was: om-1 versus om-3, W Shumaker |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Composition question., clintonr |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm, Clemente Colayco |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] 100/2 and 90 mm, Tom Scales |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
