Hi Peter, and welcome back. I have narrowed my choice of telephoto
down to a 135/2.8 and a 50-250/5, with a Tamron 400/5.6 just in case I
need longer). The zoom is really nice to use and gives lovely crisp
photos. It takes no tripod ring, but I use a Camcane monopod with
Stalker grip to rest the lens if necessary.
Chris
On Wednesday, Mar 19, 2003, at 08:58 Europe/London,
petertje@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I'm Peter Leyssens and I just re-re-resubcribed to this Olympus
mailing list. I think I first joined in 1996 (might be earlier) with
the remnants of an interest in astrophoto, but moved on to general
photography soon after that. I've got 2 pictures on TOPE, and you'll
always find me defending OM gear on photo.net.
My equipment has stabilised on my trusty OM-3, a great OM-4Ti, and
28/2.8, 50/1.8 (sticky diaphragm), 50/1.4, 90/2.0 and 75-150/4.0
lenses. Of these, I've recently only used the 90/2.0, though the
50/1.8 and the 28/2.8 have been used a lot in the past. I got the
50/1.4 (MC) almost for free when I bought some other stuff but I
didn't really try it yet. I'm not a very big fan of the 75-150/4.0.
~~~~~ ><>
Chris Barker
Gamlingay, England
mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|