Whoa, you know, you're right. It can't be a tube, cause the top mount looks
bigger than those lens mounts.
G
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Tom Scales
> Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 2:41 AM
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] Is it an OM adapter?
>
>
> And that sure does look like the OM mount.
>
> A 180/2 macro. Hmmm
>
> Tom
>
> > Chuck asked:
> > OK, guys and gals. What's the thing-a-ma-jiggie to the
> immediate left
> > of the E-system body in this shot from the dpreview article?
> > <http://www.dpreview.com/news/0303/pma2003/olympus/esysgroup.jpg>
> > It's not mentioned in the article at all. Is it a multiplier or is
> > it... or is it.. an OM adapter??????
> >
> >
> > Now look at the same picture on the Oly Japan website - our OM
> adaptor has
> > been edited out!!!!
> > <http://www.olympus.co.jp/LineUp/Digicamera/Info/nr030303aE.html>
> >
> > Jez
> >
> >
>
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
