ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!

Subject:	Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!
From:	Albert <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 03 Mar 2003 11:37:15 +0800

Yes, but at 600mm/f2.8, DoF shouldn't be a problem..

Albert


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, (continued) Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Moose Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Garth Wood [OM] 4/3, Mickey Trageser Re: [OM] 4/3, Tom Scales RE: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, George M. Anderson RE: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, George M. Anderson [OM] RE: DOF on small sensors [ was 4/3 is real!! ], Richard F. Man Re: [OM] RE: DOF on small sensors [ was 4/3 is real!! ], Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Albert <= RE: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, W Shumaker Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Tom Scales Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Gareth.J.Martin Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Gareth.J.Martin RE: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, George M. Anderson Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Gareth.J.Martin Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Moose Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, Albert Re: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, W Shumaker

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] "Vintage" prints, John A. Lind
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Tamron 80-200 f/2.8 with SP 2X and two Olympus OL mounts, Joel Wilcox
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] RE: DOF on small sensors [ was 4/3 is real!! ], Winsor Crosby
Next by Thread:	RE: [OM] 4/3 is real!!, W Shumaker
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]