I shoot mostly slides, probably 85-90%, but NPS is my standard,
all-purpose print film. I like it because of what I consider to
be its accuracy. I just don't care for the exaggerated colors and
comic paper look of a lot of other negative emulsions. Too much
stuff looks like a scene from the movie "Dick Tracy."
Walt
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2003 08:39:17 -0600
>I haven't had a lot of luck with Reala when it's underexposed
>(what I think Joel is saying below). Grain zooms up, highlights
>shift green, etc.
>
>HAVE used both Portra and NPS a lot, and have landed firmly in
>the NPS camp. Great skin tones, and slightly more "punch" than
>Portra.
>
>Dave
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|