>> Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 09:27:55 +1300
>> From: Michael Kopp <mkopp@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Ummm, do you guys who are still talking about Pan-X (presumably you mean
>> Panatomic-X) know something I don't know? Like Kodak didn't really stop
>> making Pan-X...
>
>
>< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
>< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
>< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
At 21:44 -0500 25/1/03, Andrew Gullen wrote:
>No, they just don't sell it to Kiwis anymore. Didn't they tell you?
Not me -- I'm not a Kiwi.
>Actually, presumably we mean Plus-X. At least I did. Oops. Red face.
Actually, presumably, if you do, it's weird. Never heard of using Plus-X
for B&W slides; it was a terrible film and would have had much too much
contrast.
It WAS Pan-X we used, for many years.
You can do reversal processing of almost any B&W film -- but the results
vary from poor to shit with most of them.
--
Cheers from Godzone,
Michael Kopp
Wellington, New Zealand
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|