Jan Steinman wrote:
>
> >From: "gries" <gries@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> >I know your real love will be a 4x5. MF is just a distraction.
>
> <grin>
>
> I've always thought of MF as combining the worst features of 35mm (noisy, no
> lateral/angular movements) with the worst features of LF (big, heavy,
> expensive film & lenses).
Can't agree with film, here shooting a single 4x5 is close (2/3 the
cost) to shooting a roll of 120 (film and processing), how many frame
you have with a 120? I think LF is suitable for still object only or
the stand/sit still portrait, MF can be much more flexible and fast in
operation.
C.H.Ling
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|