---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Mike Veglia <msvphoto@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 09 Jan 2003 11:57:13 -0800
>From my perspective, I would prefer to carry the 350/2.8 Tamron
>[and] SP80-200/2.8 and a couple converters than the trio you
>mention above from a size and weight perspective in the field.
Thank you, thank you. You helped me scratch the itch I've had for
a couple of weeks now to grab the 400/4 Tamron that KEH has to go
along with the 350/2.8 and 80-200/2.8 I already have. I feel much
better now.
>However, where the Tamron trio you mention really shines is that
>with an AI mount you could use 'em on a Fuji S2 body and not be
>scrounging for vaporware OM to EOS adapters that may, or may not,
>work on an EOS D body.
And thanks again for another super good idea. Maybe this is what
the money I'm saving by not buying the 400/4 can go toward. I'm
tired of waiting on whatever Olympus may or may not come up with.
Walt
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|