Subject: | Re: [OM] a purely hypothetical question... -not- OT! |
---|---|
From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Thu, 9 Jan 2003 07:16:54 EST |
In a message dated 1/9/2003 1:04:17 AM Central Standard Time, jbrokaw@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > Seems like a 250 + 1.4XA might be a good alternative setup and more flexible > than the 350/2.8 for about the same money. Anybody got any thoughts on > this...? As I put on my flame proof suit, I share my thought or perhaps my solution . . . Tamron SP 180mm f2.5, 300mm f2.8 & 400mm f4 with 1.4X and 2X converters for less $ than the one "Big White". Your question is a good one and my solution works for me. Bill Barber |
Previous by Date: | Re: [OM] a purely hypothetical question... -not- OT!, Richard F. Man |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] New member intro and story of my OM-2n purchase, Linda Wunderlich |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Re: where Jim's money goes, was "a purely hypothetical question... -not- OT!", Jim Brokaw |
Next by Thread: | [OM] a purely hypothetical question... -not- OT!, Jeff Keller |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |