Wow! to avoid digital catching us we should go for 8x10, it will take a long
time before there is any digital can match. This is the only hope of our
film users so that we can stand proud before the DC users. But I worry if
I have that money for a 8x10 system and the film & processing :-(
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mickey Trageser" <vze3m2s8@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> But it's worse, Walt. The magnification for 8x10 from 35mm is nearly
> 8.5x....
> -Mickey
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Walt Wayman" <hiwayman@xxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> > I'm on your side, Mark. I shoot big stuff too. I actually
> > thought some of the numbers were quite impressive, especially
> > considering that an 8x10 print from a 4x5 negative is only a 2X
> > enlargement, not 6X like 35mm. That means a 35mm lens would have
> > to resolve 200 lpm to equal a large format lens at 50 lpm. I
> > haven't seen any of those.
> >
> > Walt
> >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|