Thanks for the data, it looks much better than I though. Below is what
photodo say, although I'm not totally agree with it. I believe MF and
large format are much better than 35mm but not to the extend of...
what 8x10 equal to 900MP of valuable data. I have never use LF, but it
is hard to imagine.
http://www.photodo.com/nav/artindex.html
Check on the "35 mm, medium format, or large format?"
C.H.Ling
Walt Wayman wrote:
>
> A look here might prove informative.
>
> http://www.hevanet.com/cperez/testing.html
>
> Walt
>
> ---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
> From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2002 12:39:04 +0800
>
> >80-100lpmm! seems that it is better than the center resolution
> >of all lenses from Contax AF 645 MF camera I have seen from pop
> >photo test.
> >The LF lenses must be a magic! If you are talking about aerial
> >resolution, may be, I'm not sure. If on film resolution, I really
> >doubt. Check what photodo said about MF/LF resolution, they are
> >not much better than 35mm.
> >
> >C.H.Ling
>
>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|