Subject: | Re: [OM] Which OM body? |
---|---|
From: | marcus <marcusb6@xxxxxxxxx> |
Date: | Thu, 12 Dec 2002 18:49:46 -0800 (PST) |
I second the OM-1 suggestion. I use an OM-2S with an OM-1 as a backup (except in New York winter when the OM-1 is more reliable, so it becomes primary). I went from an OM-4 to the -2S. I found the constant spot of the -2S to be much easier and more intuitive to use than the momentary spot readings on the OM-4. I do find the "averaging" meter of the OM-1 annoying after getting used to spot readings, however. -Marcus __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now. http://mailplus.yahoo.com < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List > < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html > |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [OM] ( OM ) Re: What's your standard setup?, James N. McBride |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [OM] Great OM4T Champagne $295 BIN, Clemente Colayco |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM body?, John Hermanson |
Next by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM body?, Lee Penzias |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |