Subject: | Re: [OM] Which OM body? |
---|---|
From: | NSURIT@xxxxxxx |
Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2002 19:54:30 EST |
In a message dated 12/11/2002 4:20:37 PM Central Standard Time, david.sharp@xxxxxxxxxxx writes: > should I get another OM2SP Yes, if you are getting good results and are familiar with it, I would stick with it. Actually that is exactly what I've done. The fellow who does my processing has on more than one occasion commented on my exposures being accurate and consistent compared to most of what he has to process and print. My weapon of choice is the OM 2S. Bill Barber |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [OM] Kodak Emulsion Juggling, Winsor Crosby |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [OM] ( OM ) Re: What's your standard setup?, Brian Swale |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [OM] Which OM body?, Jim L'Hommedieu |
Next by Thread: | [OM] Which OM body?, Chuck Norcutt |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |