----- Original Message -----
From: "Albert" <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Hmm. It might be your Tokina..
>
> I had a picture at the zoo of my gf, one was shot with my Zuiko
> 50mm,f1.8 and the other with the Tokina 90mm/f2.5, and basically the
> exact same shot, same place, and similar composition, Same roll of film,
> same place, same lighting, everything was as close to the same as
> possible. The Tokina was MUCH sharper, so sharp I could see the pores
> on my gf's face (she doesn't appreciate her zits being filmed like that)
> but it was that sharp. It was so much more noticably sharper that I had
> no problems picking out which ones were shot with the 50mm and which was
> shot with the Tokina.
>
Mind you tell me what focusing aid you use for the 50mm and 90mm lens? Most
people use spit image for shorter lens this may cause focusing error, for
long lens if you witch to matte area focusing (since the matte area is
easier to use for long lenses) the accurate may be higher.
> But again, most tell me the 28mm/f2.8 is a serious performer, and I've
> found mine to be only so so, and still wouldn't mind selling it for a
> Tokina 28mm, but from the advice on this board, and the cost of the
> Tokina 28mm (NIB), I'd probably just buy it and keep the Zuiko still.
>
>
This one I won't argue with you, as many may remember, I never happy with
the Zuiko 28/2.8. Basically, I don't think any Zuiko 28 is outstanding.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|