Haven't gone through all yet, but the OOF effect is just not better
than the Zuiko 50/1.2! look at the two swimming pool photos, the
background is just same distracting, the out-focous bright lines has
double lines.
C.H.Ling
"om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" wrote:
>
> That actually looks much nicer, the bokeh is smoother. When I saw the
> first picture, the bokeh in the orange flowers literally JUMPED OUT at me.
> But this image is much, much smoother.
>
> You might want to try sharpening only the girl by using a layer mask.
>
> I've been hunting for some Noctilux examples to compare against. The bit
> thing that many people like is the smooth, relativly even out-of-focus
> areas of that lens. Look at these:
>
> http://www.shinozuka-family.com/f1/ (images #1, #6, #7) The background
> seems to just blur out of existance in most of these.
>
> http://www.vothphoto.com/spotlight/reviews/noctilux.htm A nice review and
> a few photos.
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/lenses/noctilux.shtml One very
> nice picture with the man and woman showing nice smooth bokeh.
>
> http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/noctilux/andyneck.htm
>
> http://w2.avis.ne.jp/~camel/portrait_05.htm COOL!
> http://w2.avis.ne.jp/~camel/room2-30.htm
> http://w2.avis.ne.jp/~camel/room2-29.htm
> http://w2.avis.ne.jp/~camel/room2-33.htm This one looks a bit harsh.
>
> Skip
>
> O
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|