Yes, honest say, the original prints looks quite uncomfortable although its
sharpness it ok. It is one of the reason I sold the 50/1.2, I only kept it
for two months. Here is another one, I think it is also wide open, the focus
is a bit off (on the shirt rather than the face). It looks to have similar
problem, see the bright rings around the light spots.
http://www.accura.com.hk/50-12-02.jpg
C.H.Ling
----- Original Message -----
From: <om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> CH,
>
> What's up with the bokeh in that picture?! It looks horrible. Look at
the
> OOF highlights to the left/down of the girl. Why would the OOF spot have
a
> hotspot _inside_ the blurred circle? ALso, the large OOF spots left/above
> are pretty harsh.
>
> Could you take another picture with OOF stuff all around the subject?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Skip
>
>
> Original Message:
> -----------------
> From: C.H.Ling chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2002 20:46:41 +0800
> To: olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [OM] shooting at f1.2 or f1.0
>
>
> This one is taken with 50/1.2 wide open, PS unsharp mask 100,0.3,0.
>
> http://www.accura.com.hk/50-12-01.jpg
>
> Standard lens is design at infinity, the performance for distance objects
is
> usually better than this portrait shot.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "John Hudson" <13874@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> >
> > Are there any opinions as to whether the Zuiko 50mm / f1.2 shot wide
open
> > would make a photo as sharp as this f1.0 photo?
> >
> > http://www.alaska.net/~rowlett/images/noctilux/bus1.htm
> >
> > jh
> >
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|
