Print sure can't see everything on film but it do represent very well
in the resolution, I think either your scanner or your photo lab has
problem. In my experience print gives all the details a 2700dpi can
do, tone/contrast/color is another issue. Loupe is just for resolution
comparison only, not for daily use.
C.H.Ling
dreammoose wrote:
>
> Ah, something photographic to discuss. Thanks Schnozz!
>
> I'm certainly with you about 4x6 prints. They can be sooo misleading
> about what's on the film
>
> Sharpness/detail: C.H. points out that there may be more detail there
> than you think - but I don't want to view my images a little bit at a
> time through a loupe. And there is still way more detail there than is
> on the film. Take a look at
> <http://home.attbi.com/0.000000E+00dreammoose/wsb/html/view.cgi-photos.html-MerchantID-50215-Publish-t-makestatic-true-skip-15.html>
> where I compared print and film scans of the same image.
>
> Tonal range/contrast:
<snap>
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|