Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] Is 4x6 the real standard?

Subject: Re: [OM] Is 4x6 the real standard?
From: "C.H.Ling" <chling@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 09:32:50 +0800
If you lab has a good lens (most labs I used have), you can even
identify two shots resolution by using a 10x lupe on a 4x6 print. I
did a lots of lens testes in the pass with one hour lab prints.

C.H.Ling  

Marc Lawrence wrote:

> 
> Actually, AG-Schnozz, you raise something that I've only
> recently noticed. I almost only ever get 4x6 prints, as
> I never see anything in the results worthy of being blown
> up (at least, not the "blown up" we photographers are
> normally talking about :-) ). After some brow-beating by
> my partner convincing me to get a few blow-ups (8x12"s)
> I have to say that 4x6" is not a good size to judge your
> prints from, at least without some experience with blow-ups
> to recognise when a 4x6" is worthy (and I'd appreciate
> any advice, suggestions or wisdom from folks on how they
> make these judgements).
> 
>

________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz