It is either the printer driver or the absorption characteristic of
different papers that cause the problem. I like the professional
device since they are more predictable, accurate and consistant. For
slides I use my Polaroid Propalette 8000 film recorder, for print I
use Fuji Frontier, I won't bother with ink and paper.
C.H.Ling
"Richard F. Man" wrote:
>
> That's true, but it is also definitely the narrow gamut of the Photo Paper.
> For example, the Premium Glossy paper is much better with the same picture
> as it has wider gamut.
>
> At 01:58 PM 11/18/2002 +0800, C.H.Ling wrote:
> >May be you can check the histogram, make sure they have sufficient
> >pixels at the white point (255) and dark point (0). Since monitor has
> >much higher D-range than paper print, something some great on monitor
> >does not necessary good on print, you need to make some clipping here
> >and usually you need to sacrifice some highlight and shadow details.
> >
> >C.H.Ling
> >
> >"Richard F. Man" wrote:
> >
________________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan
service. For more information on a proactive anti-virus service working
around the clock, around the globe, visit http://www.messagelabs.com
________________________________________________________________________
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|