I lust after the 50mm f2, but was wondering, does it's cheaper f3.5
brother give as sharp of an image?
I've read about the f2, it's legendary, but I don't know much about the 3.5.
Someone enlighten me.
Albert
I think that my understanding of the Olympus strategy will help to
understand. They decided to initially come out with a compact system
that equaled or bettered any one else's system for quality of image.
The second phase was to come out with lenses that would wow everyone
by pushing the envelope not only for quality, but especially for
speed. Size was secondary. The 3.5 was first phase and was of the
highest quality, but about as fast as anyone else's at the time.
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|