Living in Rochester, NY I have known about perfect
touch for a couple of weeks when it debuted on the
newspaper. From the samples they showed us of
incredibly badly blown out and under/overexposed shots
the algorithm did manage to salvage a 'decent' pic at
least to my eye. These samples were totally different
and included a flash disaster where current prints
resulted in white skin and stuff etc.
I agree with John though that I'm leery of having such
an algoritm apply to ALL my prints not just those that
are in need of help.
Mark Lloyd
--- Chris Barker <imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> It's not like you to sit on the fence with your
> opinions John L.
>
> ;-)
>
> How are they going to get away with it if their
> samples are not very good?
>
> Chris
>
> At 00:46 -0500 24/10/02, John A. Lind wrote:
> >Well sports fans . . . Qualex will *never* process
> another roll of
> >my C-41! They have unleashed a new printing
> process called "Perfect
> >Touch" which scans the negatives and makes digital
> prints from them.
> >
> >Semi-rant follows about an utterly clueless Kodak:
> >
>
>
> --
> ?
> ~~~~~ ><>
> Chris Barker
> Gamlingay, England
> mailto:chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> mailto:cmib@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing
> List >
> < For questions,
> mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page:
> http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Y! Web Hosting - Let the expert host your web site
http://webhosting.yahoo.com/
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|