Walt wrote:
> Question one: What is the difference in the value of the two cameras?
purely physical, they have the same weight, are of the same material, so
none!
>
> Question two: All things considered, why is the OM-3Ti supposedly worth
> more than the OM-4Ti?
You don't really need batteries, so you can save this cost over the lifetime
of the camera. (however, it makes the 3Ti a VERY expensive OM1 which
provides the same for less cost, and has a mirror lock-up and self timer,
but no manual 1/2000 speed)
>
> Question three: Assuming a fellow already has a perfectly good OM-3, is it
> worth giving up a OM-4Ti to get an OM-3Ti?
depends on the LUST for it. However, I made up my mind considering the
3Ti... I am sure I will almost never use it, the 4Ti works just the same in
manual (unless the F280 flash sync thinghy) and offers a nice auto mode as
well. The 3Ti doesn't even have a pre-fire mirror lock up. (BUT IT HAS THAT
FANTASTIC SOUND, which is exactly the same as the OM3, unless the titanium
let it sound different), so I won't buy an OM3ti, however...
Question three and a halve:
Would this fellow consider trading his OM3 for a very nice black OM4Ti?
>
> Question four: Will any opinions expressed in response to these questions
> have any bearing on my decision?
Probably not, the fact that you can't sleep over it and the fact that you
are asking these questions to justify yourself, I presume you are lost to
zuikoholism and the decision is made already, just a bit subliminal at the
moment though!
Iwert
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|