Yes, saw that but take note the owner warns you that there is a hopefully
minor defect in the lens? Fungus?
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard F. Man" <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 4:24 PM
Subject: Re: [OM] Re: 35mm film lost the battle against digital ?
>
> >..., it's also nice to handle all that lovely Oly gear isn't it? Not that
> >I'm addicted or anything (I deny denial by the way).
> >Mike Blayney (happy with the gear I've got - well almost, there is that
> >300mm 4.5 I saw the other day......................).
> >..
>
> There's one on e*babe now for $220 BIN, I think. Glad to be of help....
>
>
> // richard <http://www.imagecraft.com>
> <http://www.dragonsgate.net/mailman/listinfo>
> On-line orders, support, and listservers available on web site.
> [ For technical support on ImageCraft products, please include all
previous
> replies in your msgs. ]
>
>
> < This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
> < For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
> < Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
>
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|