See http://www.steves-digicams.com/2001_reviews/canoscan4000.html
and http://www.extremetech.com/print_article/0,3428,a
018586,00.asp
The Canon FS4000 seems to be ~half as fast and half the price of the
Nikon Coolscan 4000 with 256MB+ of memory for the dust processing.
Vuescan has batch scanning & lets you scan and edit simultaneously (vs
Twain)
tOM
On Wednesday, August 14, 2002 at 15:06, C.H.Ling
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "Re: [OM] 4000 dpi scanner recommndations?" saying:
> But it is extremely slow.
>
> C.H.Ling
>
> Tom@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> >
> > The Canon FS4000 has gotten good reviews and is much cheaper.
> >
> > tOM
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 N45.412 W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which,
if anything small falls into them they ensnare it,
but large things break through and escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|