On Wed, 31 Jul 2002, Daniel J. Mitchell wrote:
> > Low: OM1N, 28/2.8, 50/3.5, 100/2.8.
> >
> > High: OM4Ti, 24/2, 35-80/2.8, 135/2.8 Oops, no macro, but a little
> > wider range.
> >
> > What do you think? Should the basic kit include an additional
> > lens and a flash?
Throw in a T20 and T32, respectively, and you are set.
Incidentially, my "low" kit contains 28/2.8, 50/1.4, 100/2.8 and 135/3.5 +
a T20 . Looking for a 200/5 to go with it. Actually, I do not really call
it my "low" kit, since there's nothing particulary "low" about it. I call
it my "49mm kit"...:) Sometimes, it is getting company from the 85/2 as
well.
>
> The low kit is fairly slow -- the 50/1.8 is cheap enough I'd add it for
> "low light" shooting; perhaps even a 50/1.4.
>
> The fast kit has the 24/2, and indoors it's wide enough that it might work
> for shooting interiors, if not people -- but if this is the 'expensive' one,
> then you could definitely add a 50/1.4, or 50/1.2 for that extra bit of
> light capture.
No. You should add the 55/1.2 since that takes 55mm filters as well as the
24/2 and the 135/2.8 :) (that would, then, also start to approach my
prefered all-round kit btw., except that I replace the zoom with
something else..)
<SNIP>
--
-------------------------------------------
Thomas Heide Clausen
Civilingeniør i Datateknik (cand.polyt)
M.Sc in Computer Engineering
E-Mail: T.Clausen@xxxxxxxxxxxx
WWW: http://www.cs.auc.dk/~voop
-------------------------------------------
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|