If you use a 50 Bryan. I am using 50 les and less.
I have just acquired a 100/2.8 when buying a Mint, boxed OM4Ti. The
100/2.8, silver-nose, was incidental to the deal. However, I do like
it and the condition is special. I am now torn between keeping the
85/2 or the 100/2.8, especially as I expect to be using a 90/2 soon.
I really do not need all 3 and I cannot afford to keep them all. I
*had* planned to buy a Voigtlaender 125 Macro to be a
one-lens-does-it-all, but it seems to be rather a large, heavy beast.
I hope that I like my 90/2 enough to sell the 85/2 (perhaps not, it's
so compact), the 100/2.8 and the Tamron Macro 90/2.8...
Chris
At 18:18 -0400 30/7/02, Bryan Pilati wrote:
Of course, but the 85 cost twice as much as the 100. If you have the
budget, got for it. On the other hand, it is closer to the 50 than the 100,
something to consider.
Bryan Pilati
OM-2n; IS-3
Va-USA
Disclaimer: I'm always joking
unless I should be serious.
--
<|_:-)_|>
C M I Barker
Cambridgeshire, Great Britain.
?
+44 (0)7092 251126
mailto:imagopus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.threeshoes.co.uk
... a nascent photo library.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|