ML Archiv: Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter

Olympus-OM

Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter

from John A. Lind

Subject:	Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter
From:	"John A. Lind" <jlind@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Tue, 30 Jul 2002 17:23:57 -0500

At 16:00 7/30/02, Ag Schnozz wrote:

Inquiring minds want to know...


[snip]

Why was the 85/2 twice as expensive as the 100/2.8 back in 1978?


In spite of a slightly shorter focal length the 85/2 is twice as bright.

-- John


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, (continued) RE: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Bryan Pilati Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Chris Barker [OM] 90/2 was: 85/2 subject matter, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 90/2 was: 85/2 subject matter, Tom Scales RE: [OM] 90/2 was: 85/2 subject matter, Robert Gries Re: [OM] 90/2 was: 85/2 subject matter, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] 90/2 was: 85/2 subject matter, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Chris Barker Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, John A. Lind <= Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Bryan Pilati Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, John A. Lind Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Jim Couch Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, T . Clausen RE: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Timpe, Jim RE: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, om@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Mike Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, John A. Lind

Previous by Date:	Re: [OM] Heads up 350/2.8 on ebay!, Jim Brokaw
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Bryan Pilati
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Chris Barker
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] 85/2 subject matter, Bryan Pilati
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]