I want to replace my very average 'Zelar' 135/2.8 prime.
I can get a 135/3.5 zuiko for around AUD100 locally or a 135/2.8 for
around the AUD250 mark.
I suppose my question is: is the f2.8 more than double the lens of the
f3.5, from a user perspective? It will some use as a portrait lens
mainly...
would the 100 or the 85 be lots better (I did see the discussion on the
85/2!), though these are LOTS more expensive (AUD400 for the 100/3.5)
TIA,
davidt
Adelaide, South Australia
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|