> That is some nasty waveform distortion. I think I will look
> for a 24/2.8 instead. Gary's tests are vindicated once again.
>
> In the pass I was very concern about distortion (that is why
> I missed the chance of buying a like new 40/2 at $80 in 1988,
> the distrotion of this lens was reported to be 1.3%). Now I
> know besides distortion there are much more other things too.
> I once own the 24/2.8 but finally I keep the 24/2 , one of
> the reason is the large aperture that allow you to make
> accurate focus easier.
C.H., now I get it. What you are really telling me to do is to
skip the 24mm size altogether and buy a 21/2. ;-)
Pete
________________________________________________________________
GET INTERNET ACCESS FROM JUNO!
Juno offers FREE or PREMIUM Internet access for less!
Join Juno today! For your FREE software, visit:
http://dl.www.juno.com/get/web/.
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|