----- Original Message -----
From: <plp@xxxxxxxx>
> >Ok, here is some samples from my Europe trip in 92'.
> >http://www.accura.com.hk/OM/Z24.htm
> >The top left one shown the waveform distortion, that is the
> >worse case you will found and it can be avoided if more care-
> >fully when taking the shot.
>
> That is some nasty waveform distortion. I think I will look
> for a 24/2.8 instead. Gary's tests are vindicated once again.
>
>
> Pete
In the pass I was very concern about distortion (that is why I missed the
chance of buying a like new 40/2 at $80 in 1988, the distrotion of this lens
was reported to be 1.3%). Now I know besides distortion there are much more
other things too. I once own the 24/2.8 but finally I keep the 24/2 , one of
the reason is the large aperture that allow you to make accurate focus
easier.
C.H.Ling
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|