On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 01:22:31PM -0700, Barry B. Bean wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 08:52:14 -0700, Bill Stanke wrote:
>
> >Regretfully, I don't see how I could recommend Olympus, in this
> >scenario. So far, I have come up with a N*k*n FM (or FM2 or FM2n), the
> >50 mm f/1.8, and the 105 mm f/2.5.
> >
> >Questions:
> >1. What would the "third lens" be?
>
> Something in the 20-35mm range
Yes, I´d suggest 24mm when he`s not interested in another wide.
And 28mm when he might get a real wide (21..17mm) lens later.
IMHO 35mm is to close to a 50mm lens, although I like this focal lengh
as a companion to a short 85/90mm tele.
Frieder Faig
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|