On Monday, June 10, 2002 at 1:05, John A. Lind
<olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote re "Re: [OM] lens and film contrast" saying:
> At 14:20 6/9/02, Tom Trottier wrote:
...
> >The only advantage of a soft lens is that the depth of focus may be
> >increased.
>
> This is incorrect. Contrast and resolving power are two different
> things. In an MTF graph, contrast is the y-axis and resolving power
> is the x-axis. Indeed, in lens design the pursuit of both to extremes
> ultimately results in a trade-off. Create too much of one and it
> bites into the other. Various contributors to the effect are
> practical lens design aberrations which affect imagery most at wide
> open apertures and diffraction limiting which affects imagery most at
> narrow apertures.
If the lens has chromatic aberration, different colours of light will
focus at different distances. This will lead to greater depth of
field as the sharper image will come through the softer one.
Tom
------- Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur -----------------
,__@ Tom A. Trottier +1 613 860-6633 fax:231-6115
_-\_<, 758 Albert St.,Ottawa ON Canada K1R 7V8
(*)/'(*) ICQ:57647974 N45.412 W75.714
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Laws are the spider's webs which,
if anything small falls into them they ensnare it,
but large things break through and escape.
--Solon, statesman (c.638-c558 BCE)
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|