ML Archiv: RE: [OM] lens and film contrast

Subject:	RE: [OM] lens and film contrast
From:	"Wayne Harridge" <wayneharridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:	Mon, 10 Jun 2002 13:59:00 +1000

 
> The only advantage of a soft lens is that the depth of focus may be 
> increased.

Why would that be ?

...Wayne


< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
[OM] lens and film contrast, William Sommerwerck Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, dreammoose Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Roger Wesson Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Joel Wilcox Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Tom RE: [OM] lens and film contrast, Wayne Harridge <= Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, C.H.Ling Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, John A. Lind Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Tom Trottier Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, John A. Lind Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Tom Wagner Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Winsor Crosby Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, ClassicVW RE: [OM] lens and film contrast, Marc Lawrence Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, John and Julie Ockman

Previous by Date:	RE: [OM] Focus screen #9?, Wayne Harridge
Next by Date:	Re: [OM] Is it a fang if the good deal's not OM?, Daryl Hurley
Previous by Thread:	Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, Tom
Next by Thread:	Re: [OM] lens and film contrast, C.H.Ling
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]