Den/At 02-06-04 18.10 skrev/wrote "Robert Gries" <[rgg@xxxxxxxxxxx]>:
> Marten:
>
> I had the same problem as you with camera bags. At present, I have an
> f64 bag that is 7"x7"x9" that fits my "OM Classic" set-up just fine.
> This includes:
>
> OM-1n
> 50/3.5
> 135/2.8
> 35 shift
> 21/3.5
> 16/3.5
>
> With PLENTY of room to spare! The only thing I can criticize about it
> is that the strap is a bit uncomfortable, but that could be remedied by
> replacing the plastic pad with something more soft.
>
> We are certainly blessed to have such compact equipment, and the small
> size of our bags shows! ;) a friend who has an F100, 50/1.8, and some
> soupy Tamron zoom weighs a lot more, and is bigger than what I tote
> around.
I have longed for a camera backpacker bag, and with help from my girlfriend
(she the engineer...), a lot of silver tape, stuffing material (PE foam) and
a small backpacker, like the Fjallräven Kånken
<http://www.fjallraven.se/spring2002/en/23510.htm> .
An hour later, I had a bag that hold all my current OM equipment:
OM-1 and OM-4 with semi/hard cases and 50/1.8
135/2.8
35-70/3.6
28/3.5
Tokina 300/5.5
2X macro/tele converter
3 extension tubes in case
Some filters and films.
For me it's perfect!
// Johan
< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >
|