Olympus-OM
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [OM] SC vs MC rehashed (again...)

Subject: Re: [OM] SC vs MC rehashed (again...)
From: John Robison <omrobison@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 05:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
--- AG Schnozz <agschnozz@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Joel (I've got A-List lenses) Wilcox wrote:
> 
> > My main concern about SC lenses is that they are
> older. If you
> > get a mint 
> > one, it may mean it has been sitting around
> somewhere growing
> > fungus.  If 
> > it's used, it may be used up.
> 
> Yes, you must watch out for excessive "Photon Wear".
>  I probably
> only have 10-20 rolls of film left in my lenses. 
> Excessive
> photon wear is responsible for the early demise of
> many a fine
> lens.
> 
> AG-Schnozz
 Ah, but don't forget John Lind's patented PhotonLube,
an amazing scientific achevement. Tests(contucted by a
man in a white lab coat) show that deterioiation in
lenses is reduced by up to 98.4%. I've been useing it
since it was introduced April 1st and I must say the
amount of photon induced mini micro itty bitty glass
molecule dust colecting on my older silvernose lenses
has been greatly reduced!    A happy snapper in the
great NW,    John Robison

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
LAUNCH - Your Yahoo! Music Experience
http://launch.yahoo.com

< This message was delivered via the Olympus Mailing List >
< For questions, mailto:owner-olympus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >
< Web Page: http://Zuiko.sls.bc.ca/swright/olympuslist.html >


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Sponsored by Tako
Impressum | Datenschutz